Skip to content
SMEG
Review approach

Built around the questions therapy leaders need to answer.

Which notes need a closer look? What evidence supports the concern? Who should decide what happens next? SMEG is designed to make those questions easier to review, without taking authority away from the facility.

Start with evidence, not a verdict.

Rules propose documentation concerns. The reviewer should see the relevant source excerpt, benefit and setting, applicable reference or coaching rationale, and checks that could not be evaluated. Missing context is not proof of a documentation failure.

Assign the right human authority.

Qualified, discipline-appropriate reviewers must confirm, modify, dismiss, or escalate findings. QA approves release. Reviewer qualifications, responsibilities, and capacity must be agreed before a future facility pilot; this page does not represent a staffed clinical service.

Keep the official chart authoritative.

SMEG does not replace the EHR or determine medical necessity, billing, coverage, payment, or compliance. Facility clinicians and authorized leaders retain chart and operational decisions. Suggested language must never add care, observations, or findings that did not occur.

Be clear about what exists today.

Available demonstrations use synthetic information only. There is no completed clinical validation or customer-outcome evidence. Real-record pilots are not yet available; a BAA alone does not establish security readiness or authorization to process records.