Facility pricing follows the review scope.
Discuss facility size, skilled beds, PT/OT/SLP disciplines, proposed note volume, and review cadence. The options below are scope proposals, not live service packages or a commitment to accept records.
Start with a scope call and synthetic demonstration
Evaluate the proposed report format and review workflow using synthetic information. A later 1–2-building founding pilot would require agreed reviewers, written scope, and all authorization and security gates; it is not available for real records today.
1–25 skilled beds
For smaller skilled-bed counts, new review programs, or first documentation-risk review sites.
- Monthly documentation-risk review batch
- PT / OT / SLP documentation support review
- Documentation-risk screening and clinician-led validation
- Clinician-led review of high-priority findings
- Leadership-ready risk-pattern report
- Secure intake planning before PHI
26–50 skilled beds
For a single-site discussion where the proposed skilled-bed band is 26–50.
- Everything in 1–25 tier
- Expanded note/sample volume
- Part A, PDPM/MDS, Section O, and Part B visibility
- Risk themes grouped by severity and operational owner
- Monthly leadership review call during initial engagement
- Qualified discipline-reviewer and QA roles to be agreed
51–100 skilled beds
For larger skilled-bed counts, high-volume therapy departments, or regional operators reviewing one flagship site.
- Everything in 26–50 tier
- Expanded batch capacity
- Cross-discipline pattern visibility
- Facility leadership action summary
- Optional quarterly business review
- Multi-facility expansion scope available
101+ skilled beds / multi-site
For contract therapy companies, multi-site operators, or enterprise reviews needing custom governance and intake.
- Custom active-census and facility scope
- Multi-site or contract-therapy review model
- Custom sampling cadence and reporting format
- Security / BAA / intake workflow planning
- Enterprise implementation roadmap
- Commercial terms based on volume, cadence, and support needs
Final terms depend on review volume, file intake method, PHI/security requirements, reporting cadence, contract length, and whether the engagement is single-facility, multi-facility, or contract-therapy enterprise scope.
A practical path from sample notes to risk priorities.
SMEG is designed to help leadership understand documentation-risk themes without turning the first engagement into a broad software rollout. The work starts with a defined sample and a clear report.
- 1 Confirm facility type, therapy volume, payer mix, and documentation-risk goals
- 2 Begin with SMEG-supplied synthetic information only; actual records remain separately gated
- 3 Use source-aware screening prompts and clinician-controlled validation for the approved scope
- 4 Deliver a leadership-ready report with risk themes, examples, and review priorities
- 5 Decide whether ongoing monthly review makes sense for the facility or therapy operator
Request facility pricing for your documentation-review scope.
SMEG supports clinician-led documentation-risk review. It does not replace facility compliance, legal, billing, MDS, clinical, or payer-policy review.